Issue No.1118- If a person realises that he has offered the prayer before the prescribed time or he has performed it having his back towards the qiblah, he should repeat the prayer, or perform its qaḍā in case the time has lapsed. However, if he has offered prayer towards the right or left of the qiblah inadvertently, the prayer will not be void.
Issue No.799- If the consent of the owner of a property is known not verbally but from the context, the prayer in such property is correct. On the contrary if the owner permits verbally but one knows that he does not deeply agree [from his heart], he cannot perform prayer there.
Issue No.685- If a person is negligent or unmindful of the fact that he should commence offering prayer after he is certain that the time for it has set in, and if he realises after the prayer that he has offered the entire prayer in time, his prayer is in order. In case however, he realises that he has offered his entire prayer or part of it before time, his prayer is void.
Issue No.758- These days, artificial leather products are made of plastic or similar materials. Therefore, there is no problem in offering prayer in them, and if one doubts whether a product is made of artificial leather or natural (real) leather of a haram meat animal or of a dead animal, there would be no problem in the prayer offered in that leather.
Issue No.749- If a person purchases some clothes with money whose khums or zakāt has not been paid, his prayer in those clothes is void as an obligatory precaution. Similarly, if he buys some clothes on credit, and at the time of the deal, his intention is to pay for it from the money whose khums or zakāt has not been paid, or his intention is not to pay back his debt at all, his prayer is void as an obligatory precaution.
Issue No.803- There is no harm in offering prayer in hotels or in public bathhouses or other similar places which are meant for travellers and clients but performing prayer in private properties without the consent of the owner is not permissible except for when he gives a broad consent which includes performance of the prayer. For example, if he invites someone for lunch or dinner or to stay and sleep in his property from which it can be understood that he has given him permission for offering prayer as well.
Issue No.798- If a person purchases a property with money from which khums or zakāt has not been paid, his use of that property is haram, and the prayer in it is void as an obligatory precaution. The same rule applies if he purchases a property on credit, and his intention at the time of purchase is to pay for it from the money whose khums or zakāt has not been paid. The obligatory precaution in this case is to avoid using that property.
Issue No.801- There is no problem in performing prayer and using the property of a dead person who is indebted to people with the permission of the heirs provided that it is not counted as violating the creditors’ rights.
Issue No.802- If some of the deceased’s heirs are either minor, insane, or absent, use of that property and offering prayer on it are haram. However, the minor uses which are necessary in order to transfer the deceased are excluded from the rule.
Issue No.800- Making use of the property of a dead person, who has not paid zakāt or khums, and offering prayer on it is haram, unless the aforementioned debt is paid.
Issue No.804- There is no problem in offering prayer, staying, sleeping in, and minor uses of vast expanse of agricultural and non-agricultural lands which have no walls around them and are not under cultivation, whether they are located near cities and villages or far from them, or whether the owner is minor or adult. However, if the owner explicitly expresses his discontent or we come to know that he does not deeply agree [from his heart], then it is haram to benefit from and prayer will be void there, as an obligatory precaution.
Issue No.797- If a person owns a property in partnership with another person, and his share is not defined, he cannot make use of that property and also cannot offer prayer without the consent of his partner.
